<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Maine Owl</title>
    <link>http://maineowl.net/blog/</link>
    <description>Comment and nature photography from the State of Maine</description>
    <language>en-us</language>           
    <generator>Nucleus CMS v3.32</generator>
    <copyright>Â©</copyright>             
    <category>Weblog</category>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    
    <item>
 <title>Hillary to State?</title>
 <link>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1211</link>
<description><![CDATA[<i>Hardliner</i><br />
<br />
<object width="360" height="301"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sKo3xxycA2U&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sKo3xxycA2U&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="360" height="301"></embed></object><br />
<i>2006 devastation of Lebanon by Israeli bombardment... The shoe was on which foot, Hillary?</i><br />
<br />
Some reports <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/17/hillary-clinton-secretary-of-state">say</a> it's happening while others are more <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/11/17/all_eyes_on_bill_clinton.html">concerned</a> that Bill's finances might be a roadblock.<br />
<br />
My question right now is, Does the potential for one of the hardest of the hard-line Israel hawks becoming Secretary of State tick up currency of the notion of a policy "signal" to major campaign funders? It seems to me that at least  some people will rest easier that they are getting from Obama what they <a href="http://www.nysun.com/national/clinton-edwards-will-square-off-at-aipac-tonight/47843/">paid for</a> over so many months:<br />
<br />
<b>Clinton, Edwards Will Square Off At Aipac Tonight</b><br />
<i>By JILL GARDINER, Staff Reporter of the Sun | February 1, 2007</i><blockquote>Two of the leading Democratic candidates for president will compete head-to-head tonight for money and support from the same pro-Israel group. A Democratic political consultant who worked on President Clinton's re-election campaign, Hank Sheinkopf, noted that the Aipac dinner always draws a parade of politicians.<br />
<br />
"New York is the ATM for American politicians. Large amounts of money come from the Jewish community," he said. "If you're running for president and you want dollars from that group, you need to show that you're interested in the issue that matters most to them."<br />
<br />
Mrs. Clinton, who has opted out of the public campaign financing system, has tapped into the circuit of influential Jewish donors for years and has strong support in the community. A spokesman for Aipac, Joshua Block, said yesterday that the senator and former first lady has "an extremely consistent and strong record of support on issues that are important to the pro-Israel community."<br />
<br />
"She is an extraordinary leader on those issues in the United States Senate," he said.</blockquote>More on Hillary as THE biggest U.S. cheerleader for Lebanon bombardment during Summer 2006 <a href="http://maineowl.net/blog/item/250">HERE</a>.<br />
<br />
I'm not saying this is the ONLY reason Obama is moving in this direction. But surely it figures significantly in the calculations, no?]]></description>
 <category>Palestine/Israel</category>
<comments>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1211</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:23:47 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Proliferation expert to Obama: get on Israel&apos;s case</title>
 <link>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1209</link>
<description><![CDATA[<i>Will Albright receive the same hostility from Obama Jimmy Carter <a href="http://maineowl.net/blog/item/763">did</a> when Carter dared to mention Israel has nuclear weapons?</i><br />
<br />
<b><a href="http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1037539.html">U.S. study urges Obama to press Israel over nuclear program</a></b><br />
<i>By Yossi Melman, Haaretz Correspondent<br />
Last update - 09:12 16/11/2008</i><blockquote>The Middle East is in danger of accumulating large stocks of nuclear material over the next decade that could be used to produce over 1,700 nuclear bombs, a U.S. research center has projected in a newly released report.<br />
<br />
The Institute for Science and International Security, headed by David Albright, one the world's top experts on nuclear weapons and the prevention of nuclear proliferation, recently released its report urging president-elect Barack Obama to take a number of measures to avoid such an outcome, including convincing Israel to halt production of its nuclear weapons.<br />
<br />
"The Obama administration should make a key priority of persuading Israel to join the negotiations for a universal, verified treaty that bans the production of plutonium and highly enriched uranium for nuclear explosives, commonly called the Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty (FMCT)," the institute argued. "As an interim step, the United States should press Israel to suspend any production of fissile material for nuclear weapons. Toward this goal, the United States should change its relatively new policy of seeking a cutoff treaty that does not include verification. The Bush administration's rejection of the long-standing U.S. policy of requiring verification was a mistake that the incoming administration needs to rectify."</blockquote>This is wishful thinking though I am very glad it is being said by the highly respected David Albright. But I fear that instead what we are likely to see orchestrated from the Obama White House is a constant drumbeat on Iran. Albright wants to make it clear there is a lot more danger than just Iran as far as Middle East nukes go. But that position is a non-starter for the U.S. Israel Lobby.]]></description>
 <category>Palestine/Israel</category>
<comments>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1209</comments>
 <pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 14:31:21 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Maine Mall stakeholders at risk</title>
 <link>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1207</link>
<description><![CDATA[<i>Ever wonder how "flat" the world could get for NY Times columnist Tom Friedman?</i><br />
<br />
Here's a fascinating Maine connection to the global panic that seems to be <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/politics/2008/11/thomas-friedmans-world-is-flat-broke.html">impinging</a> on the family fortune of the smarmy writer:<blockquote>the author’s wife, Ann (née Bucksbaum), is an heir to the General Growth fortune. In the past year, the couple—who live in an 11,400-square-foot mansion in Bethesda, Maryland—have watched helplessly as General Growth stock has fallen 99 percent, from a high of $51 to a recent 35 cents a share.</blockquote>General Growth is the owner of the Maine Mall in South Portland, recently <a href="http://www.mainebiz.biz/news43717.html">reported</a> to be facing bankruptcy.]]></description>
 <category>Economy</category>
<comments>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1207</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:38:07 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Iraq War Ends!!</title>
 <link>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1203</link>
<description><![CDATA[<i>Fit to print</i><br />
<br />
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.nytimes-se.com/" style="border: none;" target="_blank"><a href="http://maineowl.net/blog/media/1/20081113-nyt_se_frontpage.jpg">Saturday July 4th, 2009</a></a><br />
<i>Click above for "change"</i></div><br />
<i>Update:</i> Please post your favorite short quotes from the <a href="http://blog.wired.com/sterling/2008/11/yesmen-still-on.html">YesMen</a> <i>NY Times</i> in the comments below.]]></description>
 <category>Media</category>
<comments>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1203</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:02:06 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>How to thank our veterans</title>
 <link>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1200</link>
<description><![CDATA[<i>They need more than prayer.</i><br />
<br />
Maybe you've seen the forwarded email going around that <a href="http://www.patriotfiles.com/forum/showthread.php?p=422630">starts</a><blockquote>The average age of the military man is 19 years. He is a short haired, tight-muscled kid who, under normal circumstances is considered by society as half man, half boy. Not yet dry behind the ears, not old enough to buy a beer, but old enough to die for his country. He never really cared much for work and he would rather wax his own car than wash his father's, but he has never collected unemployment either. ...</blockquote>It goes on to mention, "He obeys orders instantly and without hesitation," and "He has asked nothing in return, except our friendship and understanding." <br />
<br />
The closing is a prayer,<blockquote>Prayer wheel for our military...<br />
<br />
'Lord, hold our troops in your loving hands.<br />
Protect them as they protect us.<br />
Bless them and their families for the selfless acts<br />
they perform for us in our time of need. Amen.'</blockquote>The last line is, "Of all the gifts you could give a US Soldier, Sailor, Coastguardsman, Marine, or Airman, prayer is the very best one."<br />
<br />
I won't debate the prayer for now, though <a href="http://ivaw.org/wintersoldier">THIS</a> adds some alternate impressions. No, what I'd like to challenge head on is the notion that prayer is the "best" gift for our troops.<br />
<br />
Let's start with this continuing shocking story of rising suicide rate amongst military personnel, <a href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/health/july-dec08/suicides_11-10.html">covered</a> yesterday on the PBS News Hour:<blockquote><b>BETTY ANN BOWSER, NewsHour Correspondent:</b> By most accounts, specialist Scott Eiswert was a happy, outgoing father of three when he was deployed to Iraq in 2004 as a driver for the Tennessee Army National Guard.<br />
<br />
<b>TRACY EISWERT, Widow of Iraq Veteran:</b> Before he went, oh, my gosh, he was fun, and caring, and giving, and loved people. He was just a big kid.<br />
<br />
<b>BETTY ANN BOWSER:</b> But during his one year in the war zone, he experienced a lot of stress. There were close calls with roadside bombs. On one occasion, he saw three of his friends blown up.<br />
<br />
<b>TRACY EISWERT:</b> I was not prepared for the man that came home. No one told me what to prepare for, what to look for. No one said he would be different. No one said he'd be angry. Nobody told me how different he would be when he got home.<br />
<br />
<b>BETTY ANN BOWSER:</b> When Eiswert came home in December of 2005, he was different, radically different.<br />
<br />
<b>TRACY EISWERT:</b> He was very angry. One of the girls said, "I want my daddy back." That hurt him really, really bad. They said, "You're not my daddy."</blockquote>Over the past year, CBS News also has <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/13/cbsnews_investigates/main3496471.shtml">reported</a> on this tragic issue. But see Maine Owl <a href="http://maineowl.net/blog/item/702">HERE</a> for a troubling example of reduced priority in local coverage. What our veterans need is for their problems to be taken seriously, for hard-dick attitudes stopping people from getting the help they need to be eliminated, and above all, vastly increased funding for mental health services.<br />
<br />
Furthermore, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/10/AR2008111003181.html">THIS</a> is shameful: Our veterans organizations are forced to sue in order to get the attention of the war-crazy Bush Administration on the crying needs of veterans:<br />
<br />
<b>Suit Asks VA to Expedite Benefit Claims Handling</b><br />
<i>By Ann Scott Tyson - Washington Post Staff Writer<br />
Tuesday, November 11, 2008; Page A08</i><blockquote>Two groups representing about 60,000 military veterans filed a lawsuit yesterday seeking to force the Department of Veterans Affairs to speed up its handling of disability claims or provide interim financial relief for applicants.<br />
<br />
The lawsuit demands that the VA make an initial decision within 90 days on all claims for disability benefits and resolve any appeals within 180 days. The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, further requests that the court grant interim benefits to veterans if the VA is unable to resolve their claims under the deadlines. ...<br />
<br />
Chase McCombs, a 26-year-old Navy veteran from Phoenix, said he suffered several injuries and eyesight deterioration during a stint as a Navy mechanic that lasted more than three years, including a deployment on an aircraft carrier during the early phase of the Iraq war.<br />
<br />
After his discharge, private doctors gave him a diagnosis of optical nerve deterioration as a result of exposure to a harmful substance or head injury, and he is legally blind, he said in an interview. But he said his application for benefits related to his blindness has been denied twice since he first filed in December, and he is still awaiting a response to his appeal. ...</blockquote>No, the "best" gift for our troops is not just a prayer. It is real pressure on our government to fund and resolve the issues that threaten to rob them of the decent, respected post-war lives they deserve.]]></description>
 <category>War and peace</category>
<comments>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1200</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:58:34 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Sunday adventure</title>
 <link>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1198</link>
<description><![CDATA[<i>Portland, Maine</i><br />
<br />
<a href="http://maineowl.net/blog/media/1/20081109-backcove_360w.jpg">Back Cove trail, Portland, Maine</a><br />
<i>Trail around Back Cove</i><br />
<br />
<a href="http://maineowl.net/blog/media/1/20081109-gbheron_360w.jpg">Great Blue Heron</a><br />
<i>Great Blue Heron in Back Cove</i>]]></description>
 <category>Nature photography</category>
<comments>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1198</comments>
 <pubDate>Sun, 9 Nov 2008 15:43:16 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>More sweet notes</title>
 <link>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1196</link>
<description><![CDATA[<i>Monster slaying</i><br />
<br />
Krugman <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/05/the-monster-years/">calls</a> the monsters of the last eight years by their names: Tom DeLay, Karl Rove, and Dick Cheney.<br />
<br />
For now, "they’ve been banished to the wilderness."]]></description>
 <category>Politics</category>
<comments>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1196</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:33:13 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>More sour notes</title>
 <link>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1194</link>
<description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://angryarab.blogspot.com/">Angry Arab</a> wrote <a href="http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2008/11/remember-me-obama-bashing-begins-here.html">THIS</a> yesterday, after text mocking some Obama supporters:<blockquote>Those who supported Obama: you will be disappointed and you will remember my caution. Remember me when Obama will endorse an Israeli war on a refugee camp and on a Lebanese village, and he will call that justified self-defense. Remember me when Obama will mourn the deaths of Israelis and will celebrate the deaths of Arabs and Muslims. Remember me when he orders his first bombing campaign on some remote area of Pakistan. Remember me when he betrays the poor in favor of Wall Street. Remember me when he will betray the aspirations of black people in favor of the white middle class that is now the headline of the Democratic Party. Remember me when Obama will not fight for his health reform plan, and will he not deliver on many of his promises. Remember me when Obama will stick to his campaign promise of opposing gay marriage. Remember me when when Obama will continue to blame the failure of the American occupation of Iraq on the Iraqi people themselves. On Angry Arab: the Obama bashing has just begun and will continue unabated.</blockquote>I suppose it's possible to say that the Angry Arab is, you know, angry. But doesn't the offer to Rahm Emanuel of White House Chief of Staff signal the Obama Administration will be extremely hard-line pro-Israel? Ali Abunimah <a href="http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article9939.shtml">wrote</a> yesterday,<blockquote>In Congress, Emanuel has been a consistent and vocal pro-Israel hardliner, sometimes more so than President Bush.  In June 2003, for example, he signed a letter criticizing Bush for being insufficiently supportive of Israel. "We were deeply dismayed to hear your criticism of Israel for fighting acts of terror," Emanuel, along with 33 other Democrats wrote to Bush. The letter said that Israel's policy of assassinating Palestinian political leaders "was clearly justified as an application of Israel's right to self-defense."</blockquote>I'm afraid I must take seriously cautions from the Angry Arab that it is not so clear Obama would end Bush's aggressive policies.]]></description>
 <category>Politics</category>
<comments>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1194</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 6 Nov 2008 08:35:27 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Victory speech</title>
 <link>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1187</link>
<description><![CDATA[Yes, I thoroughly enjoyed the Obama <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/04/obama-victory-speech_n_141194.html">victory speech</a> and savored my very tiny roll in trying to help make it happen. It was deeply inspiring. My best election night since 1992, and maybe ever.<br />
<br />
Honeymoon's over.<br />
<br />
I do not believe this was a throw-away line:<blockquote><b>President-elect Obama:</b> To those who would tear this world down - we will defeat you.</blockquote>Note that was the <i>first</i> thing he said after "a new dawn of American leadership is at hand"! I just want to remind everyone that this is a peace blog. So it's my job to wonder if that was a call to arms in the sense of the Bush Doctrine.<br />
<br />
Obama also did make noises suggesting America was going to be back in the business of diplomacy. I hope so. But the choice of Rahm Emanuel as the first major appointment would signal a hard line. Ick.]]></description>
 <category>War and peace</category>
<comments>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1187</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:46:14 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Rahm Emanuel?</title>
 <link>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1185</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aeCd8KKVyyJQ&amp;refer=home">Ick</a>.<br />
<br />
The tone setting represented by Obama considering for a top job this <a href="http://men.style.com/gq/features/landing?id=content_5251">abrasive</a>, unsympathetic, blindly <a href="http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/31/prominent-jewish-congressman-floated-obama-chief-staff/">pro-Israel</a> and <a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/walsh10242006.html">pro-war</a> operative really stops my optimism in its tracks. How far will Obama have to go in providing "salve to Jewish voters"?]]></description>
 <category>Politics</category>
<comments>http://maineowl.net/blog/index.php?itemid=1185</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:25:02 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>