Skip to main content.

January 17, 2010

Cross posted from Dirigo Blue

I understand the desire of a reporter to cover a story like the earthquake in Haiti, and an editor's desire to send them there, but knowing the severity of the devestation, unless there is some truly compelling local angle, is it really necessary for a Maine based reporter to go? Multiply this hundreds of times - won't how much these "local" reporters get in the way far outweigh what they learn?

It reminds me of when authorities ask folks to stay home during a blizzard - those that venture out often end up creating more work for the road crews.

Comments

Yeah. Seems like they just want to be seen down there. It proves how generous the U.S. has been to the poverty-stricken Haitians over the years.

Or maybe not:

http://www.thirdworldtravel...

Posted by The Owl on January 18, 2010 at 12:15
This item is closed, it's not possible to add new comments to it or to vote on it