Skip to main content.

October 02, 2008

Even after reading THIS sober explanation and somewhat more spirited exchange of what might be going on underneath the "zero reserve requirement" provision in the bailout bill, I'm not convinced there are no dangers of abuse. I still think Pam Martens was onto something when she characterized this bit of de-regulation as a "Trojan Horse embedded by Wall Street lawyers."

Comments

No comments yet
This item is closed, it's not possible to add new comments to it or to vote on it